
- INSIGHT
Theodore Kiritsis, President of the International Federation of Air Traffic Safety Electronics Associations (IFATSEA), remains a man of profound professional eminence, especially when it comes to painting a lucid picture of the historical essence of IFATSEA on one hand and the bourgeoning air traffic safety electronics personnel (ATSEP) professional landscapes on the other hand.
Even after having been serving IFATSEA for about 28 years or so, Mr. Kiritsis still remains an enigma and a thorough-bred ATSEP with an uncommon and vivid perspective on air traffic safety electronics practices globally. His subsisting tenure as President of IFATSEA has been marked essentially by constant streams of sterling achievements, which have equally been expanding IFATSEA’s visibility.
Mr. Kiritsis’ ongoing and recent campaigns, including attendance of high-brow regional and international aviation events and the organization of high-level meetings with the crème de la crème in the global aviation community, have been pushing IFATSEA steadily to the fore in the global aviation space. For instance, Theodore Kiritsis, in company with IFATSEA Vice President, Patrick Delaney, recently had a one-on-one meeting with the President of the ICAO Council, Mr. Salvatore Sciacchitano, on the sidelines of the recently concluded 14th Air Navigation Conference (ANC) in Montreal, Canada. A few months ago, Mr. Kiritsis also participated in the EUROCONTROL FLY AI Forum as a speaker, delivering an impactful presentation to promote the very essence of ATSEPs within the global aviation safety value chain. He has also had a tète-à-tète with Michele Merkle, Chair of ICAO Air Navigation Bureau.
In this interview with Air Traffic Safety Electronics International Managing Editor, Adeyinka Olumuyiwa Osunwusi, Theodore Kiritsis shares his thoughts regarding some of the various horizon-expanding campaigns he has been engaging in.
From your perspective as the President of IFATSEA, what elements are most likely to define the roles and relevance of ATSEP in the context of today’s global aviation landscape?
Let me start by saying that given my duty as President of IFATSEA and ever since the General Assembly in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 2023, I have participated in many conferences, showing the flag of IFATSEA and promoting ATSEP’s interests. What is happening at the moment in the aviation ecosystem could be described as a monumental transformative awakening consisting of an intensive technological paradigm shift towards more automation and digitalization, the introduction of Artificial Intelligence and what could be described as an abstraction from the technological layer.
It’s worth emphasizing that having regard to the contemporary roles of ATSEP, technologies produced by SESAR and NextGen must necessarily take into account the Human Factor elements by buying in expertise from Professional Staff Organizations (PSOs) who will offer a reality check stemming from their operational experience. However, the various research projects that develop the said technologies do not necessarily include the ATSEP in their way of thinking. I would also like to note a clear lack of a maintenance concept wherein degraded modes of operations are taken into account when developing concepts of operations (CONOPS).
IFATSEA has been making huge efforts whenever and wherever invited, as in SESAR where we have been participating since 2005. We have also participated in dozens of meetings, providing the ATSEP perspectives aimed at our inclusion in the concept documentation. As an example, I participated at the FLY AI forum in EUROCONTROL as a speaker a couple of months ago. So, if we want ATSEP to be included in future aviation technological plans with a meaningful Task and Job Description in relevant national, regional or ICAO regulations we have to be there when discussions are taking place and decisions are being made.
You, in company with the IFATSEA Vice President, Patrick Delaney, held a high-level meeting with the President of the ICAO Council, Mr. Salvatore Sciacchitano, on the sidelines of the recently concluded 14th ICAO Air Navigation Conference in Montreal, Canada. What would you say was the actual motivation for this meeting? And was there a prior tête-à-tête between you and Mr. Sciacchitano?
As President of IFATSEA I firmly believe that it is my duty to promote the recognition of the ATSEP profession globally. Therefore, for me it was imperative that we visit the President of the ICAO Council in his office to present IFATSEA views on subjects of interest relating to ATSEP training and licensing as well as other items of mutual interest like the context of ICAO Annexes I the context of the global aviation community.
However, this was not planned in isolation. It was actually in line with the context of the Strategic Plan of IFATSEA. The one-on-one meeting with Mr. Sciacchitano was preceded by an online meeting with the ICAO CNSS (CNS and Spectrum) Department and my participation in the GNSS Spoofing and Jamming Conference in Antalya, Turkey where I met with ICAO officials. Also, just before the meeting in the ICAO Headquarters, I had an online meeting with the ICAO Air Navigation Bureau Chair, Mrs. Michele Merkle. Again on this occasion, I made a full presentation regarding our issues. All these meetings happened for the first time in the 53-year history of IFATSEA and would hopefully open new routes of communication with ICAO.
Perhaps I should add that I met the ICAO Council President a few months ago, thanks to an invitation to an aviation event based on a new IFATSEA MoU with HERMES – Air Transport Organisation and Director General, Dr. Kostas Iatrou. I had the opportunity of meeting with the President on this occasion and after a discussion we agreed to meet at the ICAO Headquarters during the ANC. I have been personally invited to over five aviation events by HERMES since last year to speak for ATSEP.

Can you talk our audience through the major issues discussed at the meeting?
The discussion included several items of technocratic interest to IFATSEA such as the context of ICAO Annex 10 in terms of the human factor elements like ATSEP competency and training, the specifications of air traffic management (ATM) systems, Annex 17 regarding the cybersecurity of air navigation service (ANS) systems and the role of ATSEP.
Additionally, the issue of ATSEP inclusion in ICAO Annex 1 was discussed with respect to various ICAO General Assembly decisions. To facilitate the discussion, a briefing memo with the main items of interest to IFATSEA had been sent to the ICAO President prior to the meeting.
In the course of the meeting, were other pertinent issues and safety case scenarios surrounding the inclusion of ATSEP in ICAO Annex 1 interrogated vis-à-vis ICAO Technical Commission’s decisions regarding Working Papers presented so far to the General Assembly on ATSEP inclusion in Annex 1?
Indeed, I elaborated on the decisions of past ICAO Assemblies regarding ATSEP inclusion in Annex 1 and the need for a related safety and financial impact study to be performed as proposed during the Assemblies. In such a case, IFATSEA would be available to contribute resources as it has done in the past, for example, in the case of the ATSEP Training Manual Doc 10057.
I also noted that a study published for the European Commission by ECORYS and NLR has indicated that regulating the ATSEP profession could bring some safety benefits whilst also proving the ATSEP job as being safety critical. The ATSEP job was also proven as being safety critical and classified as such by another official FAA Study. Moreover, the discussion touched upon the Überlingen midair collision, where one of the recommendations of the accident investigation report at the time was to investigate the establishment of a national ATSEP license. I also made reference to the Guam ILS accident.
In both cases, the contribution of ATSEP in the safety chain was not taken into account and this contributed to the two accidents. We also noted that in Annex 19, there is no clear mandatory requirement for CNS to be included in the SMS chain. All this information will be presented in the ATSEP Safety Study I am preparing to be presented at the forthcoming Assembly.

And what about issues relating to ATSEP Basic Training standardization and validation, the Human Elements of ATSEP, and ATSEP’s role in the context of increasing cybersecurity concerns in air navigation operations?
During the 14th Air Navigation Conference and in the course of the following week, IFATSEA presented a Working Paper, AN-Conf/14-WP/173 (Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel (ATSEP) Role in Cybersecurity) under Agenda Items 4 – Hyper-connectivity of air navigation system and 4.2 – Cybersecurity and information system resilience. The context of this paper was included in the briefing with the President where it was stated that ATSEPs are the first responders to any cyberattacks as they address the technical failure associated with such attacks.
In the week that followed our meeting with the President, Vice President, Patrick Delaney, dealt with several papers on Cybersecurity and ATSEP and received support from major ANSPs. For this, there will be a separate press release and report for the ANC activities. In other words, the voice of IFATSEA is being raised and heard.
How would you describe the ICAO Council President’s reactions to the issues raised at the meeting?
His reaction was very warm. The President of the ICAO Council, Mr. Salvatore Sciacchitano, stated that IFATSEA is highly valued in ICAO, which is why an Observer Status was granted a few years ago.
He invited IFATSEA to attend assemblies, conferences, and contribute to ICAO panels and expert groups. He also suggested participating in ANC talks, which is a way to enhance the visibility of ATSEP on germane issues. These online events cover various aviation topics and can provide a platform for discussing the concerns raised by IFATSEA. By focusing on ATSEP-specific events, the unique challenges and contributions of ATSEPs can be highlighted and addressed within the broader aviation community.
He wanted some more information on the Uberlingen accident, which we promised to send in. He also advised to follow ICAO Assembly decisions, for example the wording, to the Assembly Final Reports. This clearly means that IFATSEA has to intensify its activities in ICAO and especially to acquire regulatory expertise on which to base its work throughout the year. The work of the subcommittees will have to change and enable also following professional and technical issues as well as regulatory developments at the global and regional levels.
The Air Navigation Commission (ANC) plays a very strategic role within the organizational and operational ambit of the ICAO. Any synergies between IFATSEA and this strategic arm of ICAO?
As mentioned earlier, we need to have an active presence in ANC activities. Being there with robust arguments will be voicing our views and national representatives and experts will get to know us.
ANC talks, as advised by the ICAO Council President, will be an excellent forum to present and discuss our issues. For example, very few state representatives know that ATSEPs are the first responders to address a cyberattack and thus our job ensures the continuity of ANS which directly impacts performance and environmental indices relating to aircraft flying optimum trajectories, which contributes to lowering CO2 emissions.
The coming 52nd IFATSEA General Assembly promises to be a momentous event. What strategic issues are you looking forward to pushing through at the event?
After 28 years of my service in IFATSEA, I see the gathering of the IFATSEA family in one location as an event of ultimate value towards sharing information on our profession in the context of the gathering of professional ATSEP bodies from so many countries. It is a bonding event and hopefully representatives would learn what is happening in other countries both on technological and professional issues.
IFATSEA has sufficiently overcome the issues faced during the past three years with regard to registering as an NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) and attaining sound financial strength that has now allowed it to pay previous debts and finance its activities like the Conference in Antalya, Turkey on GNSS jamming and spoofing as well as the ANC event. There is also a plan to meet the European EASA Executive Director, Florian Guillermet, to promote ATSEP issues once again.
Of course, through our invited speakers such as CANSO, we seek to draw the attention to ATSEP and hear their views. Increasing the visibility to our profession and its contribution to safety and performance as well as the greening of the environment are the main strategic elements. To the other elements for this year, we have to add ATSEP shortage and the very high number of CNS/ATM outages, which are over 50 according to my data in the last 15 years. These may very well be linked to cost-cutting on ATSEP training.
Overall, how would you describe the future of ATSEP within the framework of the global aviation safety value chain?
The future of ATSEP within the global aviation safety value chain will depend on the effort that we, the ATSEP and IFATSEA, place and invest in publicising the contribution of our profession to the total ANS system performance. For example, in some discussions we had in Europe with SESAR and IATA, we proposed a KPI (Key Performance Indicator) to be linked to the availability of CNS/ATM systems and services.
Please note that an average of 3 to 6% of ATFM delays in Europe since 2019 is attributed by EUROCONTROL to these outages. If we find the root cause and address it by involving ATSEP, economies of scale will take place and our profession would be recognised as a significant contributor to safety and performance as well as the greening of the environment. Who wouldn’t be interested in our profession then? ◙
All rights reserved. No part of this material or the content of this website may be reproduced or published in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Contact: atsei@dextermarie.com
- INTERVIEWS